From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [patch] Add schema total size to psql \dn+ |
Date: | 2019-02-21 17:28:03 |
Message-ID: | CAOBaU_ZfouYfqvt0iCPrgHoOpDn-fCOCH5fPZQT8sxrB86Y5yQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 5:42 PM Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Le 21/02/2019 à 12:01, Julien Rouhaud a écrit :
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:49 AM Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
> >>> When we want to get total size of all relation in a schema we have to
> >>> execute one of our favorite DBA query. It is quite simple but what
> >>> about displaying schema size when using \dn+ in psql ?
> >>> [...]
> >>> The attached simple patch adds this feature. Is there any cons adding
> >>> this information? The patch tries to be compatible to all PostgreSQL
> >>> version. Let me know if I have missed something.
I have a few comments about the patch.
You're using pg_class LEFT JOIN pg_namespace while we need INNER JOIN
here AFAICT. Also, you're using pg_relation_size(), so fsm, vm won't
be accounted for. You should also be bypassing the size for 8.0-
servers where there's no pg_*_size() functions.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-02-21 17:28:09 | psql show URL with help |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-02-21 17:18:29 | Re: list append syntax for postgresql.conf |