From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Combine pg_walinspect till_end_of_wal functions with others |
Date: | 2023-03-07 04:42:20 |
Message-ID: | CAOBaU_YwW9ExVk+ybxGiwN6D0+vHTo-oYCS+viejWU4dYgtyNg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, 12:36 Michael Paquier, <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 09:13:46AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > It's problematic to install the extension if we rely on upgrade scripts
> only.
> > We could also provide a pg_walinspect--1.2.sql file and it would just
> work, and
> > that may have been a good idea if there wasn't also the problem of
> people still
> > having the version 1.1 locally installed, as we don't want them to see
> random
> > failures like "could not find function ... in file ...", or keeping the
> ability
> > to install the former 1.1 version (with those functions bypassed).
>
> Why would we need a 1.2? HEAD is the only branch with pg_walinspect
> 1.1, and it has not been released yet.
>
ah right I should have checked. but the same ABI compatibility concern
still exists for version 1.0 of the extension.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-03-07 04:46:42 | Re: NumericShort vs NumericLong format |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-03-07 04:36:17 | Re: Combine pg_walinspect till_end_of_wal functions with others |