From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Allow auto_explain to log plans before queries are executed |
Date: | 2020-02-27 06:31:58 |
Message-ID: | CAOBaU_Y6JfNS7v22W_yOqXSG7X8XBUQG3Nk6USsW4qUQg=uavA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 7:12 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> čt 27. 2. 2020 v 7:01 odesílatel Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> napsal:
>>
>> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 06:27:24 +0100
>> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> > čt 27. 2. 2020 v 6:16 odesílatel Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> > napsal:
>> >
>> > > Hello.
>> > >
>> > > At Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:18:16 +0900, Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
>> > > wrote in
>> > > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 18:51:21 +0100
>> > > > Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 02:35:18AM +0900, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
>> > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Attached is a patch for allowing auto_explain to log plans before
>> > > > > > queries are executed.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Currently, auto_explain logs plans only after query executions,
>> > > > > > so if a query gets stuck its plan could not be logged. If we can
>> > > > > > know plans of stuck queries, we may get some hints to resolve the
>> > > > > > stuck. This is useful when you are testing and debugging your
>> > > > > > application whose queries get stuck in some situations.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Indeed that could be useful.
>> > > >
>> > > > > > This patch adds new option log_before_query to auto_explain.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Maybe "log_before_execution" would be better?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks! This seems better also to me.
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Setting auto_explain.log_before_query option logs all plans before
>> > > > > > queries are executed regardless of auto_explain.log_min_duration
>> > > > > > unless this is set -1 to disable logging. If log_before_query is
>> > > > > > enabled, only duration time is logged after query execution as in
>> > > > > > the case of when both log_statement and log_min_duration_statement
>> > > > > > are enabled.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I'm not sure about this behavior. The final explain plan is needed at
>> > > least if
>> > > > > log_analyze, log_buffers or log_timing are enabled.
>> > > >
>> > > > In the current patch, log_before_query (will be log_before_execution)
>> > > > has no effect if log_analyze is enabled in order to avoid to log the
>> > > > same plans twice. Instead, is it better to log the plan always twice,
>> > > > before and after the execution, if log_before_query is enabled
>> > > > regardless of log_min_duration or log_analyze?
>> > >
>> > > Honestly, I don't think showing plans for all queries is useful
>> > > behavior.
>> > >
>> > > If you allow the stuck query to be canceled, showing plan in
>> > > PG_FINALLY() block in explain_ExecutorRun would work, which look like
>> > > this.
>> > >
>> > > explain_ExecutorRun()
>> > > {
>> > > ...
>> > > PG_TRY();
>> > > {
>> > > ...
>> > > else
>> > > starndard_ExecutorRun();
>> > > nesting_level--;
>> > > }
>> > > PG_CATCH();
>> > > {
>> > > nesting_level--;
>> > >
>> > > if (auto_explain_log_failed_plan &&
>> > > <maybe the time elapsed from start exceeds min_duration>)
>> > > {
>> > > 'show the plan'
>> > > }
>> > > }
>> > > }
>> > >
>> > > regards.
>> > >
>> >
>> > It can work - but still it is not good enough solution. We need "query
>> > debugger" that allows to get some query execution metrics online.
>> >
>> > There was a problem with memory management for passing plans between
>> > processes. Can we used temp files instead shared memory?
>>
>> I think "query debugger" feature you proposed is out of scope of
>> auto_explain module. I also think the feature to analyze running
>> query online is great, but we will need another discussion on a new
>> module or eature for it.
>
>
> sure. My note was about using auto_explain like query_debugger. It has not too sense, and from this perspective, the original proposal to log plan before execution has more sense.
>
> you can log every plan with higher cost than some constant.
Yes I thought about that too. If you're not in an OLAP environment
(or with a specific user running few expensive queries), setup an
auto_explain.log_before_execution_min_cost.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Takuma Hoshiai | 2020-02-27 06:35:00 | Re: Incremental View Maintenance: ERROR: out of shared memory |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-02-27 06:23:07 | Re: Crash by targetted recovery |