From: | Fede Martinez <federicoemartinez(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, andreak(at)officenet(dot)no |
Subject: | Re: Querying all documents for a company and its projects etc |
Date: | 2014-04-16 13:07:34 |
Message-ID: | CAO7JFFWjGD87MAE4aFrPzX=g-8AXaAX2vaXTf0TWv8=CMoywGw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
what about resolving the join "document doc JOIN document_usage du ON
doc.id = du.document_id" using WITH? I think this won't work because
the result of this CTE would be huge,
but you could get the company with that id first using a WITH clause
too, then you would have the name and you wouldn't have to join with
the company table.
2014-04-16 5:11 GMT-03:00 Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>:
> På mandag 14. april 2014 kl. 21:55:26, skrev David G Johnston
> <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
> A couple of thoughts:
>
> 1) The "union" really only pertains to the entity table rows; once you
> "union all" those (duplicates should not matter and probably will not even
> be present so using "all" avoids an unnecessary sort) you can join that
> sub-query to the document_usage table.
>
> 2) Since every entity must have an associated company moving the company_id
> field to the entity table will allow a direct search for company objects
> using entity alone and remove the need to perform the union. The "company"
> table omits the implicit self-referencing company_id but it is still there
> in reality.
>
> David J.
>
>
>
> Thanks for having a look at it.
>
> I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean in 1); Can you give an example
> of the query you're suggesting, joining "that subquery"?
>
> 2) Note that I need the names of the company owning each entity(person,
> project etc.), and the details about those entities (name and ID), and in my
> real app there are more entities which are not directly related to company,
> but indirectly thru a project (ie. a task) and I want to be able to list
> those entities' documents too.
>
> Do you have a suggestion for a better $subject for this kind of problem?
>
> thanks.
>
> --
> Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no> mob: +47 909 56 963
> Senior Software Developer / CTO - OfficeNet AS - http://www.officenet.no
> Public key: http://home.officenet.no/~andreak/public_key.asc
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-04-16 13:11:50 | Re: Heartbleed Impact |
Previous Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2014-04-16 13:06:20 | Re: replace function, what happens afterwards? |