On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 7:40 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> Very good catch! It looks like you have seen that in the field, then.
> Sad face.
Yeah, this happened last week on one of our replicas (version 15.5)
last week that had 134 days uptime. We are doing a lot of parallel
queries on this cluster so the combination of high uptime plus
parallel workers creation eventually triggered the issue.
> Will fix and backpatch, thanks for the report!
Thanks for handling this and for the quick answer!
Regards,
Anthonin