From: | Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add \syncpipeline command to pgbench |
Date: | 2024-01-19 07:55:31 |
Message-ID: | CAO6_XqpX1gsNq+TVgLyN3L-gpuZ84zd48Rziz6JSCCnx_MH51w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 5:08 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> The logic looks sound, but I have a
> comment about the docs: could it be better to group \syncpipeline with
> \startpipeline and \endpipeline? \syncpipeline requires a pipeline to
> work.
I've updated the doc to group the commands. It does look better and
more consistent with similar command groups like \if.
Regards,
Anthonin
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-pgbench-Add-syncpipeline-to-pgbench.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2024-01-19 08:09:47 | Re: Emitting JSON to file using COPY TO |
Previous Message | Yugo NAGATA | 2024-01-19 07:51:20 | Re: pgbnech: allow to cancel queries during benchmark |