Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block

From: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block
Date: 2024-11-22 15:30:45
Message-ID: CAO6_XqomSoChkSYQg8XL_jMgtM0wryEsdQpEV1oJbPoOojthbg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Some minor changes: I forgot to add the new pipeline meta-commands to
psql's help output, this is now added in 0002. I've also reworded the
doc a bit.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v04-0001-Reset-query-buffer-on-a-backslash-error.patch application/octet-stream 3.6 KB
v04-0002-Add-pipeline-support-in-psql.patch application/octet-stream 26.4 KB
v04-0003-Consider-pipeline-implicit-transaction-as-a-tran.patch application/octet-stream 11.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2024-11-22 16:01:22 Re: SIMD optimization for list_sort
Previous Message Erik Nordström 2024-11-22 15:02:13 Re: Changed behavior in rewriteheap