Re: How is autovacuum affected by a change in year.

From: Hanns Hartman <hwhartman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How is autovacuum affected by a change in year.
Date: 2015-02-26 19:29:22
Message-ID: CAO4T219TQfHNbztLXJ8xEZo00wN0swnoEXLFDKcDSizv9ud66w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Tom,

Yep I know its out of date but thank you for replying anyways :)

I retried my test with the autovacuum logs turned on and confirmed that a
postgresql restart fix the issue.

thanks your your help!
-HH

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Hanns Hartman <hwhartman(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I am running postgres 8.3.17 on a RedHat linux derivative using a mips64
> > architecture.
>
> You realize of course that 8.3 is long out of support ...
>
> > I've recently noticed some odd autovacuum behavior.
>
> > Recently we've had some systems deployed with the system clock set to the
> > year 2016. Postgres was installed with that date and things were fine
> > until a user noticed the incorrect date. They reset the system time back
> > to 2015 and then we started seeing weird behavior where the autovacuum
> > proccess does not seem to be maintaining the disk space.
>
> I would not be surprised if the autovacuum launcher thinks that it doesn't
> need to touch that database again until 2016. A quick DB restart should
> fix it.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2015-02-26 19:34:32 Re: "JSON does not support infinite date values"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-02-26 19:05:44 Re: ANALYZE after CREATE TABLE AS SELECT...