From: | Daniel Baktiar <dbaktiar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomonari Katsumata <katsumata(dot)tomonari(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL JDBC Driver for corresponding JDK/JVM. |
Date: | 2012-10-16 02:51:36 |
Message-ID: | CAO-HHw1xPm1uxbD_AHx96Q0jpRsxLUGM2qjKcQsSEFVYX+f=XA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Tomonari,
AFAIK jdbc1, jdbc2, jdbc3 is not about the JDK version.
It is about which JDBC driver type.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jdbc#Types
So there's nothing wrong with the yum repository.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Tomonari Katsumata <
katsumata(dot)tomonari(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm checking PostgreSQL JDBC Driver.
> I've downloaded RPM for PostgreSQL JDBC Driver from Yum Repository.
>
> http://yum.postgresql.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64/repoview/postgresql-jdbc.html
>
> And I checked the contents.
> It seems some drivers(for jdbc2, jdbc2ee, jdbc3), but
> it is just same symbolic link to postgresql-jdbc-8.3.607.jar.
>
> # ls -l postgresql*
> postgresql-jdbc-8.3.607.jar
> postgresql-jdbc.jar -> postgresql-jdbc-8.3.607.jar
> postgresql-jdbc2.jar -> postgresql-jdbc.jar
> postgresql-jdbc2ee.jar -> postgresql-jdbc.jar
> postgresql-jdbc3.jar -> postgresql-jdbc.jar
>
> I think I should change jar file corresponding JDK/JVM version.
> http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download.html#others
>
>
> Also, newer version(9.1-901) has one jar but I don't know
> which version of JDK/JVM is corresponding.
>
> # ls -l postgres*
> postgresql91-jdbc-9.1.901.jar
> postgresql91-jdbc.jar -> postgresql91-jdbc-9.1.901.jar
>
>
> Which JDK/JVM version is corresponding ?
>
> regards,
> --------------
> NTT Software Corporation
> Tomonari Katsumata
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-10-16 03:03:06 | Re: Using incorrect default-value type |
Previous Message | Arturo Pie Joa | 2012-10-16 02:46:07 | Re: Using incorrect default-value type |