Re: CVE-2024-10979 Vulnerability Impact on PostgreSQL 11.10

From: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CVE-2024-10979 Vulnerability Impact on PostgreSQL 11.10
Date: 2024-11-22 09:18:02
Message-ID: CANzqJaDVzQu2-44WRW-8wSw9bP9CSjAwe34+PKdt9Q86vYr3Rg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 4:01 AM Achilleas Mantzios - cloud <
a(dot)mantzios(at)cloud(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> wrote:

>
> On 11/22/24 10:00, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
[snip]

>
> Why not decouple client libs from the server ? i.e. psql works great
> with many versions greater than its own. And certainly with same major
> versions. You could retain the same client libs and just upgrade the
> PgSQL server to the highest minor version of the major version that you
> support.
>

Small VARs that sell turnkey solutions would rather bundle everything
together. One application version, one database version, one OS version,
one set of hardware, all bundled up and sold to a tech-illiterate customer
that doesn't employ a DBA or SysAdmin. That way, when something
stops working, you aren't guessing if it's this patch, that patch, etc etc.

Not saying that Matthias works for such a VAR, but such companies
definitely exist.

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message hubert depesz lubaczewski 2024-11-22 11:25:44 Re: PostgreSQL Log Info
Previous Message Matthias Apitz 2024-11-22 09:10:29 Re: CVE-2024-10979 Vulnerability Impact on PostgreSQL 11.10