Re: How to deal with dangling files after aborted `pg_restore`?

From: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How to deal with dangling files after aborted `pg_restore`?
Date: 2024-12-19 04:53:12
Message-ID: CANzqJaDV5TENO5Dis9D9QbndzXUyMKjohi8zZHawE5qqR_1YAw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

It could be that he only restored *some* tables in an existing database.

On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 7:02 PM Saul Perdomo <saul(dot)perdomo(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Genuine question: Why are you looking to recover from this half-cooked
> state instead of restarting the restore process from the beginning?
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, 1:10 a.m. Ivan Kurnosov <zerkms(at)zerkms(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> The scenario:
>>
>> 1. There is a postgresql 17 server running
>> 2. Restore dump with `--single-transaction` flag
>> 3. For whatever reason the server goes away (eg: we kill the process)
>> 4. Now `base` directory is filled with abandoned table files which
>> postgresql know nothing about
>>
>> Playground:
>>
>> Terminal 1:
>> Start server: `docker run --rm -it -e POSTGRES_HOST_AUTH_METHOD=trust -v
>> $PWD/postgres:/var/lib/postgresql/data postgres:17.2`
>>
>> Terminal 2:
>> 1. Start container with recent pg_restore: `docker run --rm -it -v
>> $PWD:/app -w /app postgres:17.2 bash`
>> 2. Start dump recovery: `pg_restore -h 172.17.0.2 -U postgres -d postgres
>> --single-transaction -v -Fc --no-owner dump.sql`
>>
>> Terminal 3:
>> 1. Find what container is the server: `docker ps`
>> 2. Kill it: `docker kill d7ecf6e66c1d`
>>
>> Terminal 1:
>> Start the server again, with the same command
>>
>> Terminal 3:
>> Check there are abandoned large files:
>> ```
>> # ls -la /home/ivan/postgres/base/5
>> <truncated>
>> -rw------- 1 systemd-coredump systemd-coredump 342884352 Dec 17 18:58
>> 16399
>> -rw------- 1 systemd-coredump systemd-coredump 11149312 Dec 17 18:58
>> 16404
>> -rw------- 1 systemd-coredump systemd-coredump 188416 Dec 17 18:58
>> 16403_fsm
>> -rw------- 1 systemd-coredump systemd-coredump 686145536 Dec 17 18:58
>> 16403
>> ```
>>
>> Terminal 2:
>> 1. Confirm those OIDs are not accounted:
>> ```
>> psql -h 172.17.0.2 -U postgres -c 'select * from pg_class'|grep 16404
>> psql -h 172.17.0.2 -U postgres -c 'select * from pg_class'|grep 16403
>> psql -h 172.17.0.2 -U postgres -c 'select * from pg_class'|grep 16399
>> ```
>>
>> Hence a question: am I doing something wrong? Is it expected behaviour?
>> If so - how would one recover from this scenario now WITHOUT dropping
>> entire database?
>>
>> --
>> With best regards, Ivan Kurnosov
>>
>

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Garcia Badaracco 2024-12-19 06:47:50 Re: Wrapping a where clause to preserve rows with nulls
Previous Message Adrian Garcia Badaracco 2024-12-19 04:41:58 Re: Wrapping a where clause to preserve rows with nulls