From: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Load balancing of write queries among health-checked nodes |
Date: | 2024-10-08 03:30:05 |
Message-ID: | CANzqJaD5xa=5GSQ36R-c_i6kjSVtiA7S9LbCs_RaEBUE4STS9g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 11:04 PM <me+postgres(at)kotovalexarian(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello. I have a PostgreSQL high availability cluster with Pgpool-II, but I
> don't use the virtual IP feature so my clients don't know which node to
> send queries to. DNS round-robin is not a solution because it can't
> distinguish between healthy and dead nodes.
>
> I thought about having a Pgpool-II instance on each client (client
> Pgpool-II -> cluster Pgpool-II -> PostgreSQL), but AFAIK it can't
> distribute write queries. I also know that libpq may have multiple nodes to
> connect, but I need an advanced health check because a node may have
> connectivity but be separated from the whole cluster so it must be
> considered dead.
>
Isn't that multi-master clustering?
--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> crustacean!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | me+postgres | 2024-10-08 03:41:00 | Re: Load balancing of write queries among health-checked nodes |
Previous Message | Muhammad Usman Khan | 2024-10-08 03:24:48 | Re: backup |