From: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Multiple COPY statements for one table vs one for ~half a billion records |
Date: | 2024-04-04 18:15:40 |
Message-ID: | CANzqJaCBmGpbqc6RS-BubJpeW3aUNiM3knQL0KWOmCFdoeOQvg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 2:04 PM Carl L <cllewellyno(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have around half a billion records that are being generated from a back
> end that are split into 80 threads (one per core) and I'm performing a copy
> from memory ( from stdin binary) into Postgres from each of these threads -
> i.e. there are 80 COPY statements being generated for one table that are
> running concurrently. I can see each of the Postgres processes sitting at
> around 15% CPU usage.
>
Is the target table partitioned in the same way that the input data is
split?
That would make things faster...
> These are all also in the same transaction - I am the only one connected,
> so it's not an issue to hold a big transaction.
>
Unless it fills up your WAL partition.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-04-04 18:44:30 | Re: What permissions are required for e.g. EXPLAIN UPDATE ... |
Previous Message | Carl L | 2024-04-04 18:03:56 | Multiple COPY statements for one table vs one for ~half a billion records |