On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 7:21 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
wrote:
> On 2024-May-09, Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
>
> > With RECREATE TABLE, one day, we would be probably have RECREATE TABLE
> > CONCURRENTLY implemented, making pg_repack less needed.
>
> If we really wanted to rename VACUUM FULL, I would go for a name that
> betrays its CLUSTER implementation -- maybe CLUSTER UNSORTED or so --
>
I considered that, for the same reason. But there's no such thing as an
unsorted CLUSTER, since the whole purpose of CLUSTER is to sort the data.