| From: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Could not read from file "pg_subtrans/00F5" at offset 122880: Success. |
| Date: | 2023-11-29 20:24:51 |
| Message-ID: | CANzqJaBXjYHdiecfpm0u3Fho857FwWsHTB51+K6tLbvA0wn3CA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 12:20 PM Sri Mrudula Attili <sri(at)ebi(dot)ac(dot)uk> wrote:
> Hello Laurenz,
>
>
> Thanks for your response.
>
>
> This error we are seeing on a delphix Virtual database that was
> refreshed using the snapshot of production standalone database.
>
>
> It keeps the database in pg_start_backup and to take the snapshot.
>
Isn't pg_basebackup the canonical method for taking a snapshot?
(PgBackRest, too, if you want more speed.)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2023-11-29 21:43:46 | Re: Fwd: BUG #18016: REINDEX TABLE failure |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2023-11-29 17:29:15 | Re: Could not read from file "pg_subtrans/00F5" at offset 122880: Success. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dirschel, Steve | 2023-11-29 20:25:05 | Query runtime differences- trying to understand why. |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2023-11-29 17:29:15 | Re: Could not read from file "pg_subtrans/00F5" at offset 122880: Success. |