| From: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table |
| Date: | 2024-09-28 04:49:35 |
| Message-ID: | CANzqJaAknAV3vhxQ3tnJkGbHEmQJwWhi5jVW7wYkwZx4WQh2DA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-in-general |
On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 12:39 AM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Friday, September 27, 2024, Durgamahesh Manne <
> maheshpostgres9(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>> ERROR: unique constraint on partitioned table must include all
>> partitioning columns
>> DETAIL: PRIMARY KEY constraint on table "bet" lacks column "placedon"
>> which is part of the partition key.
>> test=>
>>
>> Can't we use primary key on singal column(betid) on partitioned table
>> rather than using composite key (placedon,betid)?
>>
>
> No. It would be misleading to allow such a thing because a unique index
> can only span a single partition.
>
That is IMO a serious (and probably unfixable, given how PG stores tables)
flaw in PG's partitioning design.
--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> crustacean!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-09-28 04:55:06 | Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table |
| Previous Message | Christophe Pettus | 2024-09-28 04:39:40 | Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-09-28 04:55:06 | Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table |
| Previous Message | Christophe Pettus | 2024-09-28 04:39:40 | Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table |