Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table

From: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table
Date: 2024-09-28 04:49:35
Message-ID: CANzqJaAknAV3vhxQ3tnJkGbHEmQJwWhi5jVW7wYkwZx4WQh2DA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-in-general

On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 12:39 AM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Friday, September 27, 2024, Durgamahesh Manne <
> maheshpostgres9(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>> ERROR: unique constraint on partitioned table must include all
>> partitioning columns
>> DETAIL: PRIMARY KEY constraint on table "bet" lacks column "placedon"
>> which is part of the partition key.
>> test=>
>>
>> Can't we use primary key on singal column(betid) on partitioned table
>> rather than using composite key (placedon,betid)?
>>
>
> No. It would be misleading to allow such a thing because a unique index
> can only span a single partition.
>

That is IMO a serious (and probably unfixable, given how PG stores tables)
flaw in PG's partitioning design.

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> crustacean!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-09-28 04:55:06 Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table
Previous Message Christophe Pettus 2024-09-28 04:39:40 Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table

Browse pgsql-in-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-09-28 04:55:06 Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table
Previous Message Christophe Pettus 2024-09-28 04:39:40 Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table