Re: Can user specification of a column value be required when querying a view ?

From: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Can user specification of a column value be required when querying a view ?
Date: 2023-11-25 15:49:56
Message-ID: CANzqJaAZHnVz1i6j-6JnDEO2yKWgOfSTYcdhMGBddn-ofjMkNA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 4:49 AM Peter J. Holzer <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at> wrote:

> On 2023-11-24 13:06:45 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 1:01 PM Peter J. Holzer <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at>
> wrote:
> > On 2023-11-20 22:03:06 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > Or row level security.
> >
> > Does that help here? AIUI row level security can be used to limit
> access
> > to specific rows (e.g. user alex can access info about ssn
> '106-91-9930'
> > but not '234-56-7890') but not how many rows can be accessed in a
> single
> > query.
> >
> >
> > I don't think OP indicated that ssn in a unique key.
>
> No he didn't, but that's IMHO not relevant to the possibility of using
> row level security. If a row level security allows a user to select a
> row, that row can be selected by any query, including «select * from t».
> I don't see a way to use RLS to ensure that a query can only return a
> sufficiently small subset of the total rows a user has access to.
> How would you do that?
>

It's an alternative to functions for restricting the client to only his
data.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-11-25 16:08:28 Re: How to eliminate extra "NOT EXISTS"-query here?
Previous Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2023-11-25 13:26:56 How to eliminate extra "NOT EXISTS"-query here?