From: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improving pg_dump performance when handling large numbers of LOBs |
Date: | 2024-02-05 20:15:26 |
Message-ID: | CANzqJaA3WyFzC=-L0tBj94rq+DC+XsKSHcQMNhLdZFE=VXEhBQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Just checking... and I sympathize with your situation.
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 2:56 PM Wyatt Tellis <wyatt(dot)tellis(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yes, the LOBs themselves are tiny, but there are a lot of them (~150
> million) which seem to be slowing down pg_dump. Note, we did not
> design/build this system and agree that use of LOBs for this purpose was
> not necessary.
>
> Wyatt
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 11:36 AM Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 2:01 PM Wyatt Tellis <wyatt(dot)tellis(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We've inherited a series of legacy PG 12 clusters that each contain a
>>> database that we need to migrate to a PG 15 cluster. Each database contains
>>> about 150 million large objects totaling about 250GB.
>>>
>>
>> 250*10^9 / (150*10^6) = 1667 bytes. That's *tiny*.
>>
>> Am I misunderstanding you?
>>
>>>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2024-02-05 20:17:53 | Re: Improving pg_dump performance when handling large numbers of LOBs |
Previous Message | Wyatt Tellis | 2024-02-05 20:10:53 | Re: Improving pg_dump performance when handling large numbers of LOBs |