Re: Improving pg_dump performance when handling large numbers of LOBs

From: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improving pg_dump performance when handling large numbers of LOBs
Date: 2024-02-05 20:15:26
Message-ID: CANzqJaA3WyFzC=-L0tBj94rq+DC+XsKSHcQMNhLdZFE=VXEhBQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Just checking... and I sympathize with your situation.

On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 2:56 PM Wyatt Tellis <wyatt(dot)tellis(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Yes, the LOBs themselves are tiny, but there are a lot of them (~150
> million) which seem to be slowing down pg_dump. Note, we did not
> design/build this system and agree that use of LOBs for this purpose was
> not necessary.
>
> Wyatt
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 11:36 AM Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 2:01 PM Wyatt Tellis <wyatt(dot)tellis(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We've inherited a series of legacy PG 12 clusters that each contain a
>>> database that we need to migrate to a PG 15 cluster. Each database contains
>>> about 150 million large objects totaling about 250GB.
>>>
>>
>> 250*10^9 / (150*10^6) = 1667 bytes. That's *tiny*.
>>
>> Am I misunderstanding you?
>>
>>>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2024-02-05 20:17:53 Re: Improving pg_dump performance when handling large numbers of LOBs
Previous Message Wyatt Tellis 2024-02-05 20:10:53 Re: Improving pg_dump performance when handling large numbers of LOBs