From: | postgann2020 s <postgann2020(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Suggestion to improve query performance of data validation in proc. |
Date: | 2020-05-22 07:44:27 |
Message-ID: | CANynezONOx9SWMZ6TBdx167FFeCoRRh1SWG=UkLfK_N=cmW8Mw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Hi David,
Thanks for your feedback.
We are using the below kind of validation throughout the proc in multiple
locations and for validation we are using the below statements.
--check Data available or not for structure_id1
IF EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM schema.table_name WHERE
column1=structure_id1) THEN
is_exists1 :=true;
END IF;
We are looking for a better query than "*SELECT 1 FROM schema.table_name
WHERE column1=structure_id1*" this query for data validation.
Please suggest is there any other ways to validate this kind of queries
which will improve the overall performance.
Regards,
Postgann.
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:36 PM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> You should read through the and the contained linked FAQ - note especially
> the concept and recommendation for “cross-posting”.
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists#Email_etiquette_mechanics
>
> On Thursday, May 21, 2020, postgann2020 s <postgann2020(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>> We have multiple long procs that are having 100s of data validations and
>> currently we have written as below.
>>
>> ***********
>>
>> if (SELECT 1 FROM SCHEMA.TABLE WHERE column=data AND column=data) then
>> statements
>> etc..
>>
>> ***********
>>
>> Are there any other ways to validate the data, which will help us to
>> improve the performance of the query?
>>
>
> I have no idea what your are trying to get at here. You should try
> providing SQL that actually runs. Though at first glance it seems quite
> probable your are doing useless work anyway.
>
> David J.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-05-22 08:09:40 | Re: Suggestion to improve query performance of data validation in proc. |
Previous Message | postgann2020 s | 2020-05-22 07:34:21 | Re: Suggestion to improve query performance for GIS query. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-05-22 08:09:40 | Re: Suggestion to improve query performance of data validation in proc. |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-05-22 07:06:05 | Re: Suggestion to improve query performance of data validation in proc. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-05-22 08:09:40 | Re: Suggestion to improve query performance of data validation in proc. |
Previous Message | postgann2020 s | 2020-05-22 07:34:21 | Re: Suggestion to improve query performance for GIS query. |