From: | Jan Nielsen <jan(dot)sture(dot)nielsen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Configuration Recommendations |
Date: | 2012-04-25 05:09:19 |
Message-ID: | CANxH4hETQC28X-11UmeDwF75EK1wYpCHGYO5PYxQfBo38n7L1Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Oopps; looping in the list...
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Jan Nielsen <jan(dot)sture(dot)nielsen(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Robert Klemme <
> shortcutter(at)googlemail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Jan Nielsen
>> <jan(dot)sture(dot)nielsen(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > We are considering the following drive allocations:
>> >
>> > * 4 x 15k SAS drives, XFS, RAID 10 on SAN for PG data
>> > * 4 x 15k SAS drives, XFS, RAID 10 on SAN for PG indexes
>> > * 2 x 15k SAS drives, XFS, RAID 1 on SAN for PG xlog
>> > * 1 x 15k SAS drive, XFS, on local storage for OS
>>
>> Is it established practice in the Postgres world to separate indexes
>> from tables? I would assume that the reasoning of Richard Foote -
>> albeit for Oracle databases - is also true for Postgres:
>
>
>>
>> http://richardfoote.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/separate-indexes-from-tables-some-thoughts-part-i-everything-in-its-right-place/
>>
>> http://richardfoote.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/separate-indexes-from-tables-some-thoughts-part-ii-there-there/
>>
>> http://richardfoote.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/indexes-in-their-own-tablespace-availabilty-advantages-is-there-anybody-out-there/
>
>
> Very nice articles!
>
>
>> Conversely if you lump both on a single volume you have more
>> flexibility with regard to usage - unless of course you can
>> dynamically resize volumes.
>>
>
> Agreed.
>
>
>> To me it also seems like a good idea to mirror local disk with OS and
>> database software because if that fails you'll get downtime as well.
>> As of now you have a single point of failure there.
>>
>
> Agreed as well.
>
> These are good improvements - thanks for the review and references, Robert.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jan
>
>
>
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> robert
>>
>> --
>> remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
>> http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
>> )
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Lister | 2012-04-25 07:46:03 | Re: Configuration Recommendations |
Previous Message | Jan Nielsen | 2012-04-25 05:07:58 | Re: Configuration Recommendations |