From: | Kirk Parker <khp(at)equatoria(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Typo in PL/pgSQL trigger Example 43.4? |
Date: | 2023-10-07 18:10:28 |
Message-ID: | CANwZ8rmN_Eb0h0hoMRS8Feftaik0z89PxVsKg+cP+PctuOq=Qg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
The PL/pgSQL page on triggers (
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/plpgsql-trigger.html ) contains the
following example (I'm excerpting only the essential parts here):
Example 43.4. A PL/pgSQL Trigger Function for Auditing
...
CREATE TABLE emp_audit(
operation char(1) NOT NULL,
stamp timestamp NOT NULL,
userid text NOT NULL, -- <= COLUMN IN QUESTION
empname text NOT NULL,
salary integer
);
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION process_emp_audit() RETURNS TRIGGER AS
$emp_audit$
BEGIN
--
-- Create a row in emp_audit to reflect the operation performed
on emp,
-- making use of the special variable TG_OP to work out the
operation.
--
IF (TG_OP = 'DELETE') THEN
INSERT INTO emp_audit SELECT 'D', now(), user, OLD.*; -- <=
ARGUMENT IN QUESTION
-- similar code with same issue follows for the other TG_OPs...
The emp_audit table has a column named 'userid', which in actual usage
(next-to-last line quoted) is populated by 'user' which seems undefined in
the context. Was that intended to be 'current_user', or am I missing
something?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-10-07 18:15:34 | Re: Typo in PL/pgSQL trigger Example 43.4? |
Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2023-10-06 19:49:47 | Example numeric constants aren't valid? |