Re: Performance issues

From: Vivekanand Joshi <vjoshi(at)zetainteractive(dot)com>
To: Varadharajan Mukundan <srinathsmn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance issues
Date: 2015-03-13 19:59:45
Message-ID: CANwLwatODrcwDgO+JXG-L=jJJQTucvUrur01E-y_tE_PT8i7kQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

I am really worried about the performance of PostgreSQL as we have almost
1.5 billion records in promotion history table. Do you guys really think
PostgreSQL can handle this much load. We have fact tables which are more
than 15 GB in size and we have to make joins with those tables in almost
every query.
On 13 Mar 2015 18:40, "Varadharajan Mukundan" <srinathsmn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> If the s_f_promotion_history table will have a explosive growth, then its
> worth considering partitioning by date and using constraint exclusion to
> speed up the queries. Else, it makes sense to get started with multiple
> partial index (like, have a index for each week or something like that. You
> may want to start with a coarse grain timeline for the index and then fine
> grain it based on the needs)
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2015-03-13 20:36:24 Re: Performance issues
Previous Message Mel Llaguno 2015-03-13 19:18:30 Anyone have experience using PG on a NetApp All-Flash FAS8000?