| From: | Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Remove size limitations of vacuums dead_tuples array |
| Date: | 2019-10-11 13:49:11 |
| Message-ID: | CANwKhkMK9YxZJo_NKBLyXgPcoB_5Fqmf3M=ev8jU19=UEHhtVw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 17:05, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> There already was a attempt to make this improvement, see [1]. There was
> a fairly long discussion about how to best do that (using other data
> structure, not just a simple array). It kinda died about a year ago, but
> I suppose there's a lot of relevant info in that thread.
>
> [1]
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAGTBQpbDCaR6vv9%3DscXzuT8fSbckf%3Da3NgZdWFWZbdVugVht6Q%40mail.gmail.com
Thanks for the pointer, wow that's a long thread. For some reason it did
not consider lifting the INT_MAX tuples/12GB limitation. I'll see if I can
pick up where that thread left off and push it along.
Regards,
Ants Aasma
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2019-10-11 13:50:07 | Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2019-10-11 12:20:54 | Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status) |