From: | Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Lucas Possamai <drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Connections - Postgres 9.2 |
Date: | 2016-05-16 16:27:35 |
Message-ID: | CANu8FizfqeVuRtHXJUKEugeM+-vjy0UY4GN3rco+xKx4zWHo0w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Lucas Possamai <drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> [image: Inline images 1]
>
> Those IDLE connections, might be because the user/application didn't
> commit the transaction?
>
No, IDLE connections means the user (or application) connected and did not
disconnect.
IDLE IN TRANSACTION means the user (or application) started a transaction
and did not commit (yet).
--
*Melvin Davidson*
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Klaus P. Pieper | 2016-05-16 16:27:54 | Toolchain for extensions (language C, Visual Studio 2013 / 2015) |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-05-16 16:27:33 | Re: Connections - Postgres 9.2 |