Re: How to ALTER EXTENSION name OWNER TO new_owner ?

From: Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Colin 't Hart" <colinthart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How to ALTER EXTENSION name OWNER TO new_owner ?
Date: 2017-08-09 19:37:23
Message-ID: CANu8FizXD8g-i=5exAP=0sUUD-U5vgWRijUc3M-WhGanOA87qQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:32 PM, David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> *>I'm am wondering whether "REASSIGNED OWNED" **needs fixing as well*
>>
>> *Possibly, but as the op is on 9.3, it is not available to him.*
>>
>
> ​You should check the docs again...​
>
>
>> *I would also argue that since* *"OWNER TO new_owner" is available in
>> all other ALTER object statements, it is an omission and should be*
>> *included for extenstions as well..*
>>
>
> ​As am I, but omission or not I don't recall that we've ever back-patched
> new SQL grammar.
>
> David J.
> ​
>
*>You should check the docs again...​*

*Yes, you are correct, it is in 9.3*

*>I don't recall that we've ever back-patched new SQL grammar.*

*I am not saying back patch, I am saying an enhancement for version 10 or
11.*

--
*Melvin Davidson*
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-08-09 20:30:03 Re: Multixact members limit exceeded
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2017-08-09 19:32:49 Re: How to ALTER EXTENSION name OWNER TO new_owner ?