From: | Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Colin 't Hart" <colinthart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How to ALTER EXTENSION name OWNER TO new_owner ? |
Date: | 2017-08-09 19:37:23 |
Message-ID: | CANu8FizXD8g-i=5exAP=0sUUD-U5vgWRijUc3M-WhGanOA87qQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:32 PM, David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> *>I'm am wondering whether "REASSIGNED OWNED" **needs fixing as well*
>>
>> *Possibly, but as the op is on 9.3, it is not available to him.*
>>
>
> You should check the docs again...
>
>
>> *I would also argue that since* *"OWNER TO new_owner" is available in
>> all other ALTER object statements, it is an omission and should be*
>> *included for extenstions as well..*
>>
>
> As am I, but omission or not I don't recall that we've ever back-patched
> new SQL grammar.
>
> David J.
>
>
*>You should check the docs again...*
*Yes, you are correct, it is in 9.3*
*>I don't recall that we've ever back-patched new SQL grammar.*
*I am not saying back patch, I am saying an enhancement for version 10 or
11.*
--
*Melvin Davidson*
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-08-09 20:30:03 | Re: Multixact members limit exceeded |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2017-08-09 19:32:49 | Re: How to ALTER EXTENSION name OWNER TO new_owner ? |