Re: Question about wal files / pg_xlogs

From: Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Patrick B <patrickbakerbr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question about wal files / pg_xlogs
Date: 2016-08-04 20:29:40
Message-ID: CANu8FizL4NinvyS2YAZgiaSXCa5C-8FcHVt=ov7csS45s8wZpw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Patrick B <patrickbakerbr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
>>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/continuous-archiv
>> ing.html#BACKUP-ARCHIVING-WAL
>>
>> "However, archive_command can be changed with a configuration file
>> reload."
>>
>> <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
>
>
> Cheers... I removed the IONICE command from the archive_command. However,
> did not see any difference.
>
> Any idea?
>
>
Just out of curiostity, are the slaves in the same physical location, or by
some chance are they on a remote site?

--
*Melvin Davidson*
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Patrick B 2016-08-04 20:32:54 Re: Question about wal files / pg_xlogs
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2016-08-04 20:27:02 Re: Question about wal files / pg_xlogs