Re: pg_relation_size performance issue

From: Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hans Guijt <hg(at)terma(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_relation_size performance issue
Date: 2015-06-04 14:07:01
Message-ID: CANu8FiyZ9yhvjV9OzdrQYenOgJLi5EMBotqpM82xe_NTD0_VKg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Correction, pg_relation_size includes toast data.

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> I'm not sure why you are adding toast to table size, since
> pg_relation_size already does that.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/interactive/functions-admin.html
>
> This query might work better and faster for you.
>
> SELECT n.nspname as schema,
> c.relname as table,
> a.rolname as owner,
> c.relfilenode as filename,
> c.reltuples::integer,
> pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size( quote_ident( n.nspname ) ||
> '.' || quote_ident( c.relname ) )) as size,
> pg_size_pretty(pg_total_relation_size( quote_ident( n.nspname
> ) || '.' || quote_ident( c.relname ) )) as total_size,
> pg_relation_size( quote_ident( n.nspname ) || '.' ||
> quote_ident( c.relname ) ) as size_bytes,
> pg_total_relation_size( quote_ident( n.nspname ) || '.' ||
> quote_ident( c.relname ) ) as total_size_bytes,
> CASE WHEN c.reltablespace = 0
> THEN 'pg_default'
> ELSE (SELECT t.spcname
> FROM pg_tablespace t WHERE (t.oid =
> c.reltablespace) )
> END as tablespace
> FROM pg_class c
> JOIN pg_namespace n ON (n.oid = c.relnamespace)
> JOIN pg_authid a ON ( a.oid = c.relowner )
> WHERE c.relname = 'sensor'
> AND n.nspname = 'devtest';
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> Hans Guijt <hg(at)terma(dot)com> writes:
>> > I have a Postgres 9.3.7 database, freshly created on Ubuntu 14 LTS 64
>> bit, and at this time almost completely empty. I'm attempting to find the
>> size of a table, using the following code:
>> > SELECT
>> > pg_relation_size (stat.relid),
>> > CASE WHEN cl.reltoastrelid = 0 THEN
>> > 0
>> > ELSE
>> > pg_relation_size (cl.reltoastrelid) + COALESCE ((
>> > SELECT SUM (pg_relation_size (indexrelid)) FROM pg_index WHERE
>> indrelid=cl.reltoastrelid
>> > ), 0)::int8
>> > END,
>> > COALESCE ((SELECT SUM (pg_relation_size (indexrelid)) FROM pg_index
>> WHERE indrelid=stat.relid), 0)::int8
>> > FROM pg_stat_all_tables stat
>> > JOIN pg_class cl ON cl.oid=stat.relid
>> > JOIN pg_namespace ns ON cl.relnamespace=ns.oid
>> > WHERE UPPER (cl.relname) = UPPER ('sensor')
>> > AND UPPER (ns.nspname) = UPPER ('devtest')
>>
>> Getting rid of the useless join to pg_stat_all_tables would probably help;
>> there's a lot of computation in that view.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Melvin Davidson*
> I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
> wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
>

--
*Melvin Davidson*
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melvin Davidson 2015-06-04 14:08:04 Re: pg_relation_size performance issue
Previous Message Melvin Davidson 2015-06-04 14:03:27 Re: pg_relation_size performance issue