Re: PostgreSQL Developer Best Practices

From: Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: CaT <cat(at)zip(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Berend Tober <btober(at)computer(dot)org>, Ray Cote <rgacote(at)appropriatesolutions(dot)com>, pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Developer Best Practices
Date: 2015-08-25 00:53:43
Message-ID: CANu8FiyEQaH365HvKsG3Asyrj+LOVLZOYt=XqbNMzh9hNHMywQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

You are right, he was probably talking about FK's. I was just so frustrated
about people insisting that using "ID" as the primary key in every table is
a "good" idea,
I didn't bother to reply previously. I stand firm on my belief that the
primary key should be something meaningful and NOT "id" just for the sake
of having a unique numeric key.

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:39 PM, CaT <cat(at)zip(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 08:22:17PM -0400, Melvin Davidson wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Berend Tober <btober(at)computer(dot)org>
> wrote:
> > >> 1) What happens if someone mis-types the account-id?
> > >> To correct that, you also need to correct the FK field in
> the
> > >> other dozen tables.
> > >
> > > ... ON UPDATE CASCADE ?
> >
> > I believe he's talking about triggers.
>
> Huh? Why would you use a trigger when FOREIGN KEY has ON UPDATE CASCADE?
>
> --
> "A search of his car uncovered pornography, a homemade sex aid, women's
> stockings and a Jack Russell terrier."
> -
> http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/wacky/indeed/story-e6frev20-1111118083480
>

--
*Melvin Davidson*
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Flower 2015-08-25 02:02:17 Re: PostgreSQL Developer Best Practices
Previous Message CaT 2015-08-25 00:39:53 Re: PostgreSQL Developer Best Practices