Re: pg_upgrade problem

From: Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade problem
Date: 2015-06-16 16:05:09
Message-ID: CANu8FiwkGNHUuJPEnKeMbmDgUgaFAqQLgJyM7YOm5H=V+eVRyw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Yup, that looks like the problem.
Doing:
postgres=# SELECT * FROM pg_auth_members
postgres-# WHERE roleid NOT IN (SELECT oid FROM pg_authid);

Yields, 11 Rows, so for sure someone must have been messing around. Thanks.

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>
wrote:

> Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
> > Using pg_upgrade in 9.4 CentOS release 6.6 (Final) (from PostgreSQL
> 9.1.15) it fails when GRANTING permits to roles.
> >
> > Checking pg_upgrade_dump_globals.sql, I see the point of failure is
> caused by the -- Role memberships section.
> >
> > In there I see the following troublesome lines.
> > -- Role memberships
> > ...
> > ...
> > ....
> > GRANT "supers" TO "pgpoolad" GRANTED BY "postgres";
> > GRANT "" TO "";
> > GRANT "" TO "";
> > GRANT "" TO "";
> > GRANT "" TO "";
> > GRANT "" TO "";
> > GRANT "" TO "";
> > GRANT "" TO "";
> > GRANT "" TO "";
> > GRANT "" TO "" GRANTED BY "postgres";
> > GRANT "" TO "";
> > GRANT "" TO "";
> >
> > Doing a pg_dumpall -g on the database produces the same result.
>
> Well then I don't presume this is a pg_upgrade issue.
>
> Inspect your pg_auth_members catalog for entries referring to rows
> absent from pg_authid.
>
> Did someone manually remove rows from pg_authid?
>
> > I am pretty sure this is catalog corruption.
> >
> > Can anyone else confirm and/or suggest a recommended fix?
> >
> > --
> > Melvin Davidson
> >
>
> --
> Jerry Sievers
> Postgres DBA/Development Consulting
> e: postgres(dot)consulting(at)comcast(dot)net
> p: 312.241.7800
>

--
*Melvin Davidson*
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-06-16 17:47:50 Re: [HACKERS] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Previous Message Jerry Sievers 2015-06-16 15:58:27 Re: pg_upgrade problem