Re: Dependency tree to tie type/function deps to a table

From: Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeremy Finzel <finzelj(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Dependency tree to tie type/function deps to a table
Date: 2017-12-13 15:54:59
Message-ID: CANu8FiwU1LsBcNz5wp__tby1CXpTEN99HDfFHiQeoJ8g0d83JA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Jeremy Finzel <finzelj(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > It looks like the very useful dependency tree shown when using DROP
> CASCADE
> > is written in C in dependency.c, but there is no way to leverage this
> > within Postgres to actually query an object's dependencies. Can we get
> > this somehow as a Postgres client in SQL?
>
> Seems like you could build a query for that easily enough using a
> recursive union over pg_depend plus pg_describe_object() to produce
> text descriptions of the entries.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

Jeremy ,

per Tom

>Seems like you could build a query...

Attached is the query that I use. Hope that helps you.

--
*Melvin Davidson*
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.

Attachment Content-Type Size
table_dependents.sql text/plain 768 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yogesh Sharma 2017-12-13 16:55:13 Re: Size of pg_multixact/members increases 11355
Previous Message Nicola Contu 2017-12-13 15:49:04 pgstattuple free_percent to high