From: | Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Smith <tomsmith1989sk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: fastes way to retrieve segmented without using loop |
Date: | 2015-08-23 21:43:18 |
Message-ID: | CANu8FiwE-E6ZwhAMNt5vaF5Zft0ZAmkzdZPu5GO66sjoPVYsiw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Correction:
SELECT DISTINCT ON EXTRACT(HOUR FROM you_time_column)
*
FROM table
WHERE t >=1
LIMIT 99998;
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Well, I would say the following might work:
>
> SELECT *
> FROM table
> WHERE t >=1
> LIMIT 99998;
>
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Tom Smith <tomsmith1989sk(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello:
>>
>> I have a time series table,
>> using below sql, loop (psque code), I can get one row for each hour
>>
>> for( H=1: H< 99999; H++){
>> select * from table where t >= H and t < H+1 limit 1
>> }
>>
>> t (time column) is indexed).
>>
>> Is there a better way to use a issue a SINGLE SQL
>> with an array of time start/end pair
>> so it will be executed once to send back result, which would be much
>> faster
>> than issuing sql again and again (even with prepared statement and using
>> sql function).
>>
>> Thanks in Advance
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Melvin Davidson*
> I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
> wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
>
--
*Melvin Davidson*
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John McKown | 2015-08-23 22:04:41 | Re: fastes way to retrieve segmented without using loop |
Previous Message | Melvin Davidson | 2015-08-23 21:38:44 | Re: fastes way to retrieve segmented without using loop |