Re: [SPAM] psql 9.3 automatic recovery in progress

From: Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Moreno Andreo <moreno(dot)andreo(at)evolu-s(dot)it>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SPAM] psql 9.3 automatic recovery in progress
Date: 2016-10-10 18:19:29
Message-ID: CANu8FiwCc7BoqyJt5waR85Gnz3Wa2B4rjw05HP6Zx1suDWrPwA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Moreno Andreo <moreno(dot)andreo(at)evolu-s(dot)it>
wrote:

>
> Il 10/10/2016 18:24, Periko Support ha scritto:
>
>> 2016-09-12 09:00:01 PDT LOG: server process (PID 23958) was
>> terminated by signal 9: Killed
>>
>
> 2016-09-12 10:00:01 PDT LOG: server process (PID 30766) was
>> terminated by signal 9: Killed
>>
>
> 2016-09-12 15:00:01 PDT LOG: server process (PID 22030) was
>> terminated by signal 9: Killed
>>
>>
>> These datetimes could be suspect. Every crash (kill) is done at
> "00"minutes and "01" minutes, that makes me ask "Isn't there something like
> cron running something that interfere with postgres?"
>
> Cheers,
> Moreno.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

The general philosphy is to start by setting shared_memory to 1/4 system
memory, so
shared_buffers should be 20480 MB

--
*Melvin Davidson*
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-10-10 18:22:14 Re: psql 9.3 automatic recovery in progress
Previous Message Moreno Andreo 2016-10-10 18:14:58 Re: [SPAM] psql 9.3 automatic recovery in progress