Re: moving to PostgreSQL from MS-SQL and from Oracle, looking for feature comparison information

From: Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jack Christensen <jack(at)jackchristensen(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: moving to PostgreSQL from MS-SQL and from Oracle, looking for feature comparison information
Date: 2015-05-09 14:27:03
Message-ID: CANu8Fiw9oyL_OoosZHpr0QgvTavaGPFHcREaou1peOcY5d2iYQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

In addition to the other great comments and advice that have been posted,
you might want to review the "Database Compatibility Technology for Oracle"
document from EnterpriseDB.

http://www.enterprisedb.com/solutions/oracle-compatibility-technology

On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Jack Christensen <jack(at)jackchristensen(dot)com>
wrote:

> On 05/09/2015 06:33 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
>> Temporary tables will be in memory unless they overflow work_mem and we
>> do support unlogged tables and tablespaces which you could stick out on a
>> ramdisk if you want.
>>
> I would suggest not putting a table space on a ramdisk. According to the
> docs this risks corrupting the entire cluster.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/manage-ag-tablespaces.html
>
> Jack
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

--
*Melvin Davidson*
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Moran 2015-05-09 14:47:07 RPM building tools and info missing?
Previous Message Jack Christensen 2015-05-09 12:32:35 Re: moving to PostgreSQL from MS-SQL and from Oracle, looking for feature comparison information