Re: SELECT x'00000000F'::int leading zeros causes "integer out of range"

From: Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Chris Lexvold <lexvold(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SELECT x'00000000F'::int leading zeros causes "integer out of range"
Date: 2017-02-24 19:17:15
Message-ID: CANu8Fiw=cBcEdOA4VtXieDY4bswmUyWF7xmA+pgg7QyHp_XwHA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> > Is this expected behavior ?
> > ts=# SELECT x'00000000F'::int;
> > ERROR: 22003: integer out of range
> > LOCATION: bittoint4, varbit.c:1575
>
> Yes. The provided operation is "convert a bitstring of up to 32 bits
> to an integer". It's not "guess whether it's okay to throw away some
> bits to make an integer".
>
> As an example, even if you think it's obvious that it would be okay
> to convert that bitstring to "15", would it be all right to convert
> x'FFFFFFFFF' to "-1" ?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In addition to what Tom said

SELECT x'00000000F'::bigint;

works just fine.

IOW, int = 4 bytes, while bigint = 8 bytes.
--
*Melvin Davidson*
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2017-02-24 19:25:34 Re: SELECT x'00000000F'::int leading zeros causes "integer out of range"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-02-24 19:13:06 Re: SELECT x'00000000F'::int leading zeros causes "integer out of range"