From: | Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Issue with markers in isolation tester? Or not? |
Date: | 2025-01-13 23:33:57 |
Message-ID: | CANtu0oixObnevEDSvp=6wz=DBHb18NS6YJmqmzNSVOJChwngAA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello!
In case if someone will look for a workaround - it is possible to use
"notices N" mark.\
Instead of
step before {
SELECT injection_points_run('injection-points-wait-2');
}
use something like:
step before {
DO $$
BEGIN
PERFORM injection_points_run('injection-points-wait-2');
RAISE NOTICE 'before is complete';
END $$
}
and then:
permutation
after(before notices 1)
before
detach1
wakeup1
detach2
wakeup2
permutation
after(before notices 1)
wakeup1
before
detach1
detach2
wakeup2
in such a case, both permutations report "before" to be completed before
"after", not after.
Best regards,
Michail.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alena Rybakina | 2025-01-13 23:51:47 | Re: pgsql: Consolidate docs for vacuum-related GUCs in new subsection |
Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-01-13 23:21:31 | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |