Re: Why doesn't GiST VACUUM require a super-exclusive lock, like nbtree VACUUM?

From:	Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:	Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
Subject:	Re: Why doesn't GiST VACUUM require a super-exclusive lock, like nbtree VACUUM?
Date:	2025-02-05 10:11:40
Message-ID:	CANtu0oi_u=Y7tdT=mnAzJqdh1vEYozR_tdbpbPR7093tfDY00g@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2021-11-03 23:33:08 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>  2021-11-04 15:52:22 from Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> 📎   2021-11-04 15:58:29 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>    2021-11-05 10:26:09 from Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>     2021-12-01 01:09:14 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> 📎      2021-12-01 01:39:19 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>      2021-12-09 01:40:37 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>  2024-12-03 01:18:14 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> 📎   2024-12-03 16:21:04 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>    2025-01-04 01:00:34 from Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> 📎     2025-01-06 23:45:18 from Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> 📎      2025-01-09 21:00:03 from Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com>       2025-01-09 21:35:17 from Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>        2025-01-10 01:09:42 from Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com>         2025-01-10 17:06:10 from Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com> 📎          2025-02-05 10:04:00 from Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com> 📎           2025-02-05 10:11:40 from Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com> 📎
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

Attachment	Content-Type	Size
v7-0004-This-should-fix-issues-with-incorrect-results-whe.patch	application/octet-stream	10.6 KB
v7-0002-This-should-fix-issues-with-incorrect-results-whe.patch	application/octet-stream	10.3 KB
v7-0003-Also-add-ability-to-set-LP_DEAD-bits-in-more-case.patch	application/octet-stream	2.6 KB
v7-0001-isolation-tester-showing-broken-index-only-scans-.patch	application/octet-stream	11.5 KB

In response to

• Re: Why doesn't GiST VACUUM require a super-exclusive lock, like nbtree VACUUM? at 2025-02-05 10:04:00 from Michail Nikolaev

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Ilia Evdokimov	2025-02-05 10:15:51	Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements
Previous Message	Michail Nikolaev	2025-02-05 10:04:00	Re: Why doesn't GiST VACUUM require a super-exclusive lock, like nbtree VACUUM?