From: | Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | [PATCH] Comments related to "Take fewer snapshots" and "Revert patch for taking fewer snapshots" |
Date: | 2020-02-10 09:42:46 |
Message-ID: | CANtu0ogp6cTvMJObXP8n=k+JtqxY1iT9UV5MbGCpjjPa5crCiw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, hackers.
Yesterday I have noticed that in simple protocol mode snapshot is
taken twice - first time for parsing/analyze and later for execution.
I was thinking it is a great idea to reuse the same snapshot. After
some time (not short) I was able to find this thread from 2011 with
exactly same idea (of course after I already got few % of performance
in POC):
And it was even merged: "Take fewer snapshots" (
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=d573e239f03506920938bf0be56c868d9c3416da
)
But where is optimisation in the HEAD?
It absent because was reverted later in 2012 because of tricky reasons
( https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/5075D8DF.6050500%40fuzzy.cz
) in commit "Revert patch for taking fewer snapshots." (
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=532994299e2ff208a58376134fab75f5ae471e41
)
I think it is good idea to add few comments to code related to the
topic in order to safe time for a next guy.
Comments-only patch attached.
Thanks,
Michail.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
comments.patch | text/plain | 849 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-02-10 11:03:31 | Re: ERROR: subtransaction logged without previous top-level txn record |
Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2020-02-10 09:39:12 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |