From: | Jeevan Ladhe <jeevanladhe(dot)os(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | server log inflates due to pg_logical_slot_peek_changes/pg_logical_slot_get_changes calls |
Date: | 2023-03-19 11:29:17 |
Message-ID: | CANm22CjRxdzVPA96JVbETP3=qG6TBSZrhg8deofcEoyyaOmFzg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I observed absurd behaviour while using pg_logical_slot_peek_changes()
and pg_logical_slot_get_changes(). Whenever any of these two functions
are called to read the changes using a decoder plugin, the following
messages are printed in the log for every single such call.
2023-03-19 16:36:06.040 IST [30099] LOG: starting logical decoding for
slot "test_slot1"
2023-03-19 16:36:06.040 IST [30099] DETAIL: Streaming transactions
committing after 0/851DFD8, reading WAL from 0/851DFA0.
2023-03-19 16:36:06.040 IST [30099] STATEMENT: SELECT data FROM
pg_logical_slot_get_changes('test_slot1', NULL, NULL, 'format-version',
'2');
2023-03-19 16:36:06.040 IST [30099] LOG: logical decoding found consistent
point at 0/851DFA0
2023-03-19 16:36:06.040 IST [30099] DETAIL: There are no running
transactions.
2023-03-19 16:36:06.040 IST [30099] STATEMENT: SELECT data FROM
pg_logical_slot_get_changes('test_slot1', NULL, NULL, 'format-version',
'2');
This log is printed on every single call to peek/get functions and bloats
the server log file by a huge amount when called in the loop for reading
the changes.
IMHO, printing the message every time we create the context for
decoding a slot using pg_logical_slot_get_changes() seems over-burn.
Wondering if instead of LOG messages, should we mark these as
DEBUG1 in SnapBuildFindSnapshot() and CreateDecodingContext()
respectively? I can produce a patch for the same if we agree.
Regards,
Jeevan Ladhe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-03-19 11:45:00 | Re: Fix fseek() detection of unseekable files on WIN32 |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-03-19 11:20:27 | Re: Fix fseek() detection of unseekable files on WIN32 |