Re: Planning of sub partitions

From: Matt Hughes <hughes(dot)matt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planning of sub partitions
Date: 2024-07-05 16:06:13
Message-ID: CANi6QLwZ-caHoe=6=1vyg5ULaZGh0XqW9i=HEYOsE0kKsqUnag@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

One workaround seems to be using a CTE with a union:

with openAndRecentlyRaisedEvents as (
select * from event where cleared is false
union all
select * from event
where cleared is true and date_raised > '2024-01-01' AND date_raised <
'2024-01-02';
)
select * from openAndREcentlyRaisedEvents

On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 11:24 AM Matt Hughes <hughes(dot)matt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I am trying to model a stateful `event` table using partitions. An event
> has date_raised (not null) and date_cleared (nullable) columns. An event
> is in the "open" state when it has a null date_cleared; it is in the
> "closed" state when date_cleared is set. Once date_cleared is set, it
> won't change.
>
> While most events close after a short period of time, a few stragglers
> stay open for weeks or months. I'm trying to optimize my system for the
> following things:
>
> - I need to drop events older than N days; I want to use partitions so I
> can just drop the table rather than an expensive DELETE
> - Users want to see all open events OR closed events within the past N days
>
> To do this, I came up with the following schema:
>
> create table event (
> id uuid not null,
> cleared boolean not null,
> date_raised timestamp without time zone not null,
> date_cleared timestamp without time zone,
> primary key (id, date_raised, cleared)
> ) PARTITION BY LIST (cleared);
>
> CREATE TABLE event_open PARTITION OF event FOR VALUES IN (false);
> CREATE TABLE event_closed PARTITION OF event FOR VALUES IN (true)
> partition by range(date_raised);
> CREATE TABLE event_closed_y2024_m01 PARTITION OF event_closed FOR VALUES
> FROM ('2024-01-01') to ('2024-02-01');
> CREATE TABLE event_closed_y2024_m02 PARTITION OF event_closed FOR VALUES
> FROM ('2024-02-01') to ('2024-03-01');
>
> This works for the most part but the plan for my compound query does not
> behave as I would expect:
>
> -- 1. correctly only picks event_open partition
> explain select * from event where cleared is false;
>
> -- 2. correctly picks all event_closed_* partitions
> explain select * from event where cleared is true;
>
> -- 3. correctly picks just the event_closed_y2024_m01 partition
> explain select * from event where cleared is true and date_raised >
> '2024-01-01' AND date_raised < '2024-01-02';
>
> -- 4. uses all partitions; should exclude event_closed_y2024_m02
> explain select * from event
> where
> cleared is false OR
> (cleared is true and date_raised > '2024-01-01' AND date_raised <
> '2024-01-02');
>
> QUERY PLAN
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Append (cost=0.00..110.91 rows=2322 width=25)
> -> Seq Scan on event_open event_1 (cost=0.00..33.10 rows=774 width=25)
> Filter: ((cleared IS FALSE) OR ((date_raised > '2024-01-01
> 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (date_raised < '2024-01-02
> 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone)))
> -> Seq Scan on event_closed_y2024_m01 event_2 (cost=0.00..33.10
> rows=774 width=25)
> Filter: ((cleared IS FALSE) OR ((date_raised > '2024-01-01
> 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (date_raised < '2024-01-02
> 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone)))
> -> Seq Scan on event_closed_y2024_m02 event_3 (cost=0.00..33.10
> rows=774 width=25)
> Filter: ((cleared IS FALSE) OR ((date_raised > '2024-01-01
> 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (date_raised < '2024-01-02
> 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone)))
>
>
> Is this a bug? Query 4 is just a union of queries 2/3 which pick the
> right partitions. Do you see anything else wrong with this approach?
>
> Note that `closed` column is somewhat of a hack as it is completely
> computeable from `date_cleared is not null`. However, as I understand it,
> partitions can only be declared on values that are part of the primary
> key.
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Pospisek 2024-07-05 16:07:31 apt-archive.postgresql.org a bit broken?
Previous Message Peter J. Holzer 2024-07-05 15:40:35 Re: confused about material view locks please explain