From: | Radoslav Nedyalkov <rnedyalkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: conflict with recovery when delay is gone |
Date: | 2020-11-14 19:45:35 |
Message-ID: | CANhtRibNoWJR-YGEikW3JLxfhvXV+xdNU7Hce7ZH9xBr-9_8ww@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 8:13 PM Radoslav Nedyalkov <rnedyalkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 7:37 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 15:24 +0200, Radoslav Nedyalkov wrote:
>> > On a very busy master-standby setup which runs typical olap processing -
>> > long living , massive writes statements, we're getting on the standby:
>> >
>> > ERROR: canceling statement due to conflict with recovery
>> > FATAL: terminating connection due to conflict with recovery
>> >
>> > The weird thing is that cancellations happen usually after standby has
>> experienced
>> > some huge delay(2h), still not at the allowed maximum(3h). Even
>> recently run statements
>> > got cancelled when the delay is already at zero.
>> >
>> > Sometimes the situation got relaxed after an hour or so.
>> > Restarting the server instantly helps.
>> >
>> > It is pg11.8, centos7, hugepages, shared_buffers 196G from 748G.
>> >
>> > What phenomenon could we be facing?
>>
>> Hard to say. Perhaps an unusual kind of replication conflict?
>>
>> What is in "pg_stat_database_conflicts" on the standby server?
>>
>
> db01=# select * from pg_stat_database_conflicts;
> datid | datname | confl_tablespace | confl_lock | confl_snapshot |
> confl_bufferpin | confl_deadlock
>
> -------+-----------+------------------+------------+----------------+-----------------+----------------
> 13877 | template0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> 0 | 0
> 16400 | template1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> 0 | 0
> 16402 | postgres | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> 0 | 0
> 16401 | db01 | 0 | 0 | 51 |
> 0 | 0
> (4 rows)
>
> On a freshly restarted standby we've just got similar behaviour after a 2
> hours delay and a slow catch-up.
> confl_snapshots is 51 and we have exactly the same number cancelled
> statements.
>
>
No luck so far. Searching for the explanation i found we fail into the
unexplained case when
snapshot conflicts happen even hot_standby_feedback is on.
Thanks,
Rado
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mohamed Wael Khobalatte | 2020-11-14 22:48:38 | Re: conflict with recovery when delay is gone |
Previous Message | Job | 2020-11-14 19:29:33 | Bi-directional Replica updates |