Re: Disallow UPDATE/DELETE on table with unpublished generated column as REPLICA IDENTITY

From: Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Disallow UPDATE/DELETE on table with unpublished generated column as REPLICA IDENTITY
Date: 2024-11-29 08:07:50
Message-ID: CANhcyEV-2dpYRk0ZiXTqJFxgge4m3wDJ88N1p=Mnaj8iwMS27w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 at 16:38, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 5:30 PM Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
>
> Review comments:
> ===============
> 1.
> +
> + /*
> + * true if all generated columns which are part of replica identity are
> + * published or the publication actions do not include UPDATE or DELETE.
> + */
> + bool replident_valid_for_update;
> + bool replident_valid_for_delete;
>
> These are too generic names for the purpose they are used. How about
> instead name them as gencols_valid_for_update and
> gencols_valid_for_delete?
>
> 2. The comments atop RelationBuildPublicationDesc() is only about row
> filter. We should update it for column list and generated columns as
> well.
>
> 3. It is better to merge the functionality of the invalid column list
> and unpublished generated columns as proposed by Hou-San above.
>

Thanks for reviewing the patch. I have addressed the comments and
updated the patch.

Thanks and Regards,
Shlok Kyal

Attachment Content-Type Size
v12-0001-Disallow-UPDATE-DELETE-on-table-with-generated-c.patch application/octet-stream 22.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2024-11-29 08:19:33 RE: crash with synchronized_standby_slots
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2024-11-29 07:54:02 Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes