From: | Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Virtual generated columns |
Date: | 2025-01-23 11:52:18 |
Message-ID: | CANhcyEUhMbhkhUg2bZQ0gE-F9gRLXkKdd_EuN0rBbHP6TRdsCg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 at 19:08, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 13.01.25 19:15, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 at 16:14, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Here is a new patch version
> >
> > In expand_generated_columns_in_expr():
> >
> > + RangeTblEntry *rte;
> > +
> > + rte = makeNode(RangeTblEntry);
> > + rte->relid = RelationGetRelid(rel);
> > +
> > + node = expand_generated_columns_internal(node, rel, rt_index, rte);
> >
> > This dummy RTE is a bit too minimal.
> >
> > I think it should explicitly set rte->rtekind to RTE_RELATION, even
> > though that's technically not necessary since RTE_RELATION is zero.
> >
> > In addition, it needs to set rte->eref, because expandRTE() (called
> > from ReplaceVarsFromTargetList()) needs that when expanding whole-row
> > variables. Here's a simple reproducer which crashes:
> >
> > CREATE TABLE foo (a int, b int GENERATED ALWAYS AS (a*2) VIRTUAL);
> > ALTER TABLE foo ADD CONSTRAINT foo_check CHECK (foo IS NOT NULL);
>
> Thanks, fixed. Here is a new patch with that fixed and also a few
> tweaks suggested by Jian.
>
> I've also added a patch that addresses logical replication. It
> basically adds back some of the prohibitions against including generated
> columns in publications that have been lifted, but this time only for
> virtual generated columns, and amends the documentation. It doesn't
> rename the publication option "publish_generated_columns", but maybe
> that should be done.
Hi Peter,
I tried to apply the patch on HEAD but it is not applying.
Rebase is required because of recent commits.
Thanks and Regards,
Shlok Kyal
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yura Sokolov | 2025-01-23 12:03:04 | Re: [RFC] Lock-free XLog Reservation from WAL |
Previous Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2025-01-23 11:47:05 | RE: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |