From: | Curt Kolovson <curt(at)kolovson(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Paul Förster <paul(dot)foerster(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: how reliable is pg_rewind? |
Date: | 2020-08-03 06:25:06 |
Message-ID: | CANhYJV51dkAvkab=gu3oP=XhQJvY2Eq6wvX5Pixh2Fb=OLJe-A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks, Paul and Michael. I forgot to mention that we're using postgres
v10.12.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 10:29 PM Paul Förster <paul(dot)foerster(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Hi Curt, hi Michael,
>
> > On 03. Aug, 2020, at 03:58, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 10:35:37AM -0700, Curt Kolovson wrote:
> >> Any info on the reliability of pg_rewind and its limitations would be
> appreciated.
> >
> > FWIW, we use it in production to accelerate the redeployment of
> > standbys in HA configuration for 4 years now in at least one product,
> > and it is present in upstream for since 9.5, for 5 years now. So the
> > tool is rather baked at this stage of the game.
>
> same here. We use it with Patroni in failover cluster setups for about 2-3
> years now. It has not failed us yet.
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paul Förster | 2020-08-03 06:44:19 | Re: how reliable is pg_rewind? |
Previous Message | Paul Förster | 2020-08-03 05:29:10 | Re: how reliable is pg_rewind? |