From: | "Wayne E(dot) Seguin" <wayneeseguin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3 |
Date: | 2015-08-17 16:24:28 |
Message-ID: | CANf8RLv=UsHu+0bDS-fLJWhZATeE+hf8rW7DyUF2vbfWuTO_Vg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thank you everyone for your replies, the thoughts and context are greatly
appreciated!
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 13 August 2015 at 23:52, Wayne E. Seguin <wayneeseguin(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > The context of this is using BDR to implement a HA solution where we
> have
> > one node getting all connections at a time, if the node fails we move all
> > connections to another node. (eg. only one node gets all connections at
> any
> > given time).
>
> This sounds like a job better suited to a normal active/standby
> configuration with regular built-in streaming replication. Use a tool
> like repmgr to manage failover and a proxy like pgbouncer to redirect
> traffic.
>
> There's no reason to use async multi-master replication when simple
> single-master replication will do just as well.
>
> --
> Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
--
~Wayne
Wayne E. Seguin
wayneeseguin(at)gmail(dot)com
wayneeseguin on irc.freenode.net
http://twitter.com/wayneeseguin/
https://github.com/wayneeseguin/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jony Cohen | 2015-08-18 06:56:49 | Re: First-class Polymorphic joins? |
Previous Message | Zdeněk Bělehrádek | 2015-08-17 14:30:47 | Re: How to EXPLAIN a trigger function |