Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3

(But thank you for the response!!!)

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Wayne E. Seguin <wayneeseguin(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> The question is specifically about the replication feature mentioned here
> http://www.pgpool.net/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page for the purposes of
> failing over minimizing downtime.
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 08/13/2015 08:52 AM, Wayne E. Seguin wrote:
>>
>> "BDR is only one in Beta compare to stable options:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication,_Clustering,_and_Connection_Pooling
>>> .
>>> Not sure why this solution would be chosen. Experience with pgpool is
>>> that you only needed to change a port and no SQL changes required on an
>>> application side."
>>>
>>> I appreciate any input as to pros/cons of BDR vs PGPool-II v3 in this
>>>
>>
>> BDR is async multi master. PGPool is largely just a connection pooler
>> with load balancing (although it has other features). They play different
>> sports.
>>
>> JD
>>
>>
>> --
>> Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
>> PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
>> Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
>> control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ~Wayne
>
> Wayne E. Seguin
> wayneeseguin(at)gmail(dot)com
> wayneeseguin on irc.freenode.net
> http://twitter.com/wayneeseguin/
> https://github.com/wayneeseguin/
>

--
~Wayne

Wayne E. Seguin
wayneeseguin(at)gmail(dot)com
wayneeseguin on irc.freenode.net
http://twitter.com/wayneeseguin/
https://github.com/wayneeseguin/