From: | "Wayne E(dot) Seguin" <wayneeseguin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3 |
Date: | 2015-08-13 15:52:41 |
Message-ID: | CANf8RLtkw29MG=VfA9xWNPRHXF-2WwKBU2FaY8maHRsqMCYwhA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello everyone!
The context of this is using BDR to implement a HA solution where we have
one node getting all connections at a time, if the node fails we move all
connections to another node. (eg. only one node gets all connections at any
given time).
I am looking for help / advice on how to answer the following question I
was presented with:
"BDR is only one in Beta compare to stable options:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication,_Clustering,_and_Connection_Pooling.
Not sure why this solution would be chosen. Experience with pgpool is that
you only needed to change a port and no SQL changes required on an
application side."
I appreciate any input as to pros/cons of BDR vs PGPool-II v3 in this
context.
~Wayne
Wayne E. Seguin
wayneeseguin(at)gmail(dot)com
wayneeseguin on irc.freenode.net
http://twitter.com/wayneeseguin/
https://github.com/wayneeseguin/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2015-08-13 16:28:21 | Re: [BDR] vs pgpool-II v3 |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2015-08-13 15:14:16 | Re: Sync replication + high latency server |