From: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name |
Date: | 2022-07-15 11:19:37 |
Message-ID: | CANbhV-HuWHuxFFZMJkEKOqW_ab6nQXYX4T4_+nbG1N=JEG7dcQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 12:15, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 09:12, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > On 2022-Jul-15, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 04:44, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> >
> > > > This patch has been marked as waiting for a review, however the CF bot
> > > > is completely red:
> > >
> > > Yes, it is failing, but so is current HEAD, with some kind of libpq
> > > pipelining error.
> >
> > Hmm, is it? Where can I see that? The buildfarm looks OK ...
>
> I got this... so cleaning up and retesting.
>
> # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 20.
> t/001_libpq_pipeline.pl .. Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
>
> Failed 2/20 subtests
>
> Test Summary Report
> -------------------
> t/001_libpq_pipeline.pl (Wstat: 512 Tests: 20 Failed: 2)
> Failed tests: 9-10
> Non-zero exit status: 2
> Files=1, Tests=20, 4 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.66 cusr
> 0.64 csys = 1.32 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
Yeh, repeated failures on MacOS Catalina with HEAD.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Borisov | 2022-07-15 11:20:58 | Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15 |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2022-07-15 11:15:32 | Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name |