Re: Buffer Manager and Contention

From: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Buffer Manager and Contention
Date: 2022-02-25 03:34:27
Message-ID: CANbhV-GyZqFvWzsO2BJXRoNHGghbTyTwSSUw5qWdh8XP2r4ywg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 at 01:20, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Yura Sokolov is proposing a patch to separte the two partition locks.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1edbb61981fe1d99c3f20e3d56d6c88999f4227c.camel%40postgrespro.ru
>
> And it seems to me viable for me and a benchmarking in the thread
> showed a good result. I'd appreciate your input on that thread.

Certainly, I will stop this thread and contribute to Yura's thread.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-02-25 03:47:27 Re: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-02-25 03:31:15 Re: why do hash index builds use smgrextend() for new splitpoint pages