Re: MERGE RETURNING

From: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Miles Elam <miles(dot)elam(at)productops(dot)com>
Cc: PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MERGE RETURNING
Date: 2022-11-23 19:11:52
Message-ID: CANbhV-EXmw9i4YhJTgsrLrE-JgUH55MJo6SLCt12mbXjPGuoLA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 19:03, Miles Elam <miles(dot)elam(at)productops(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Are there any plans to (or specific decisions not to) support a RETURNING clause on MERGE statements in future versions of Postgres? The only reference I could find in the mailing list archives was this comment, which suggested it was desired but simply not technically feasible at the time.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202203161918.qz6phlortw2w@alvherre.pgsql
>
> e.g.
>
> MERGE INTO customer_account ca
> USING (SELECT customer_id, transaction_value FROM recent_transactions) AS t
> ON t.customer_id = ca.customer_id
> WHEN MATCHED THEN
> UPDATE SET balance = balance + transaction_value
> WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
> INSERT (customer_id, balance)
> VALUES (t.customer_id, t.transaction_value)
> RETURNING customer_account.*;

I think the only issue was getting the work done in the time available.

I don't see any problems with that as a feature, but AFAIK there are
no plans for that.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Danny Shemesh 2022-11-23 19:23:49 Re: Index filter instead of index condition w/ IN / ANY queries above certain set size
Previous Message Miles Elam 2022-11-23 19:02:44 MERGE RETURNING