Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits

From: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits
Date: 2022-06-30 08:08:23
Message-ID: CANbhV-EQUbF6vNCnca4qowN7C=3mO1aG0E3TASapBYpcKEzB5A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 at 03:43, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 12:41 AM Simon Riggs
> <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > The reason to mention this now is that it would give more space than
> > 56bit limit being suggested here.
>
> Isn't 2^56 enough, though?

For me, yes.

To the above comment, I followed with:

> I am not opposed to the current
> patch, just finding ways to remove some objections mentioned by
> others, if those became blockers.

So it seems we can continue with the patch.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2022-06-30 08:16:24 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2022-06-30 08:01:00 Patch proposal: New hooks in the connection path